1.
2. When looking at project #1, I did notice multiple elements
and priniciples; however, I think it would have to be completely intentional
for a photographer to limit the amounts of these elements.
3.None of the artists that I chose were in my peers collection,
but this was done intentionally. I wanted to see why different art attracted my
peers attention, and through that, I developed a better understanding of the
individual.
4. Charles E Burchfield “Winter, East Liverpool 1927,” Oil on
Canvas, really peaked my interest, but in an indifferent way. The art itself
seems to be a caricature, and almost a cartoonish representation of that time
and place: which leaves to question, what is the distinction between fine art
and television? I’m not sure if I love this piece or not, but I keep finding
myself staring it at.
5. What I found to be really fascinating in reviewing both
projects by two individuals was the level of knowledge I have acquired about
both of my peers. Ashley’s art: in both projects, contained some form of nature
in it. Abstract Muse’s art: was almost always abstract, and these qualities
permeated through her photography. It’s really interesting to see what
motivates and inspires others artists to create.
6. I found both comments to be very insightful: as they
supported and critiqued my style. I think constructive critism is imperative:
as long as it doesn’t render one useless. Gaining the perceptions of others has
helped me identify my strengths and weaknesses.
No comments:
Post a Comment