1. Explain why you selected each of the TWO videos you
choose from the selection listed above.
The reason I selected the cubism video is because I had
previously taken an interest in cubism, and I was curious s to what the video
would exemplify. The second video that I
chose was the Dada video, because I had never heard of it before, although,
while watching it I had recognized the style of Dada.
2. For each video list/discuss the key concepts you learned.
In the Cubism video, Juan Gris described cubism as deconstructing
images which starts as shapes and ends with a situation we recognize from our
own experience. I learned about the way
in which Cubism plays with the viewers perception of the image. Cubism artists
may use multiple perspectives of the same object to emphasis certain features
of that object. This same technique is used in Hannah Hoch’s “ New York”
collage, which isn’t Cubism, rather it is classified under Dada. Artist, Kurt
Schwitters’ is considered one of the founders of Dada. He used everyday objects
in his art, but isn’t concerned so much with the object, as he is with “ the
music the light plays on them.”
2. How do the videos relate to the readings in the text?
The readings in the text give the concepts of cubism and
Dada a context. After World War 1, concerns over war and economic/ social equality
became the center of the arts. Through Art, many of the discussions regarding
these issues were brought to the mainstream: allowing for the progression of
many societies. The text also describes the pretext to the evolution of
surrealism, cubism, and dada. The Avant-Garde movement facilitated a change in
perspective for many artists around the world: allowing for new, bold ideas in
the art culture. George Grosz
exemplifies this in his “untitled” painting of Germany, where everything is
lacking the fundamental characteristics that make human life worth living.
No comments:
Post a Comment